Santoyo v. Hedpath

Full title: JESUS SANTOYO, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY HEDPATH, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Oct 5, 2009

CV 08-5463-R (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2009)

Opinion

JESUS SANTOYO, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY HEDPATH, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 08-5463-R (JEM) United States District Court, C.D. California. October 5, 2009

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          MANUEL L. REAL, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired, and no Objections have been filed. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that judgment be entered dismissing the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus with prejudice.