Summary
In Sandhill, by adopting the dissenting opinion, we held that this reference to skill and dexterity incorporates "the traditional distinction between a game of skill and a game of chance pursuant to state law" such that it prohibits sweepstakes conducted through video games in which "chance predominates over skill."
Summary of this case from Gift Surplus, LLC v. State ex rel. CooperOpinion
No. 170A11–2.
2012-12-14
Daughtry, Woodard, Lawrence & Starling, Smithfield, by Kelly K. Daughtry, for plaintiff-appellees. Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by John F. Maddrey, Solicitor General, and Hal F. Askins, Special Deputy Attorney General, for defendant-appellants.
Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A–30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ––– N.C.App. ––––, 724 S.E.2d 614 (2012), reversing an order entered on 29 November 2010 by Judge Paul C. Ridgeway in Superior Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 17 October 2012. Daughtry, Woodard, Lawrence & Starling, Smithfield, by Kelly K. Daughtry, for plaintiff-appellees. Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by John F. Maddrey, Solicitor General, and Hal F. Askins, Special Deputy Attorney General, for defendant-appellants.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in Hest Technologies, Inc. v. State ex rel. Perdue, ––– N.C. ––––, ––– S.E.2d ––––, 2012 WL 6218202 (2012), the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.
REVERSED.