Opinion
3:11-cv-00273-LRH-WGC
09-07-2012
AMADEO SANCHEZ, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEVADA, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb (#71) entered on July 17, 2012, recommending granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#24) filed on November 16, 2011, and denying Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (#69) filed on July 11, 2012. Plaintiff filed his Objections to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#72) on August 10, 2012. Defendants have not filed a response. This matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
Refers to court's docket number.
The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of the Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#71) entered on July 17, 2012, should be adopted and accepted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#71) entered on July 17, 2012, is adopted and accepted, and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#24) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (#69) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
______________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE