From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fort v. County of Cumberland

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Dec 18, 2014
367 N.C. 798 (N.C. 2014)

Opinion

No. 340P14.

12-18-2014

Samuel and Doris FORT, Julia Katherine Faircloth, Raeford B. Lockamy, II, OK Farms of Cedar Creek, LLC, and Arnold Drew Smith v. COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND, North Carolina, and Tigerswan, Inc.

Charles C. Meeker, for Tigerswan, Inc. Rickey L. Moorefield, County Attorney, for County of Cumberland. Robin Tatum Currin, for Fort, Samuel, et al. George B. Currin, for Fort, Samuel, et al. Robert A. Hasty, Jr., for County of Cumberland.


Charles C. Meeker, for Tigerswan, Inc.Rickey L. Moorefield, County Attorney, for County of Cumberland.

Robin Tatum Currin, for Fort, Samuel, et al.

George B. Currin, for Fort, Samuel, et al.

Robert A. Hasty, Jr., for County of Cumberland.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 16th of September 2014 by Petitioners in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A–31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

“Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of December 2014.”


Summaries of

Fort v. County of Cumberland

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Dec 18, 2014
367 N.C. 798 (N.C. 2014)
Case details for

Fort v. County of Cumberland

Case Details

Full title:Samuel and Doris FORT, Julia Katherine Faircloth, Raeford B. Lockamy, II…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Dec 18, 2014

Citations

367 N.C. 798 (N.C. 2014)
367 N.C. 798

Citing Cases

Starlites Tech. Corp. v. Rockingham Cnty.

We review a superior court's interpretation of a zoning ordinance de novo, and "apply the same principles of…