Opinion
March, 1932.
On argument, order appointing receiver modified so as to provide that the two attorneys agreed on by counsel be appointed receivers in the place and stead of the present appointee, and as so modified affirmed. Appeal from order denying motion to vacate order appointing receiver dismissed. Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.
See post, p. 747. — [REP.