From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rubin v. City of New York

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County
Sep 20, 1948
192 Misc. 745 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1948)

Opinion

September 20, 1948.

Emanuel Rosenstein and Samuel F. Gold for plaintiff.

Emanuel Morgenbesser for Wyckoff Laundry System, Inc., defendant.


If the rule announced in Smith v. Woodbury Farms Realty Corp. ( 265 A.D. 885) is to be restricted to accidents happening on private property as distinguished from the public highway, the court which made the decision should promulgate such limitation — not the Special Term. (See Levine v. Rosenman, 192 Misc. 1010.)

Accordingly, the motion to preclude is granted unless plaintiff shall serve a further bill of particulars setting forth (a) the city ordinances, regulations and statutes which plaintiff claims defendant violated; (b) the nature and extent of the prior head injury which plaintiff claims was aggravated by the present accident; (c) the length of time plaintiff will claim he was incapacitated from his employment; (d) the loss of earnings, if any, plaintiff will claim. Settle order on notice requiring bill to be served within twenty days after service of the order herein.


Summaries of

Rubin v. City of New York

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County
Sep 20, 1948
192 Misc. 745 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1948)
Case details for

Rubin v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH RUBIN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Defendants

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County

Date published: Sep 20, 1948

Citations

192 Misc. 745 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1948)
84 N.Y.S.2d 344

Citing Cases

Levine v. Rosenman

Orders on notice. See, also, Rubin v. City of New York, 192 Misc. 745. —…

Kozak v. Berger

Since plaintiff in his complaint alleges in paragraph "Sixth" that defendant, among other things, negligently…