From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rouser v. White

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 3, 2007
No. CIV S-93-767 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-93-767 LKK GGH P.

April 3, 2007


ORDER


On February 8, 2007, the court ordered plaintiff to file his pretrial statement within twenty days. The court ordered defendants' pretrial statement due twenty days thereafter.

On February 28, 2007, plaintiff filed a letter with the court stating that he could not prepare his pretrial statement due to his inability to access his legal property. On March 16, 2007, plaintiff filed his pretrial statement. Good cause appearing, plaintiff's pretrial statement is deemed timely filed.

On March 19, 2007, defendants filed a request for extension of time to file a pretrial statement. Defendants request until April 9, 2007, to file their pretrial statement.

On January 24, 2007, the court vacated the March 27, 2007, jury trial date.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's pretrial statement is deemed timely filed;

2. Defendants' pretrial statement is due on or before April 9, 2007.


Summaries of

Rouser v. White

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 3, 2007
No. CIV S-93-767 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2007)
Case details for

Rouser v. White

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM ROUSER, Plaintiff, v. THEO WHITE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 3, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-93-767 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2007)