From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rossi v. Brockway

Court of Chancery of Delaware
Mar 16, 2004
Civil Action No. 290-S (Del. Ch. Mar. 16, 2004)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 290-S.

March 16, 2004.

Richard E. Berl, Jr. Smith, O'Donnell, Procino Berl, L.L.P. Georgetown, DE.

Paul G. Enterline Georgetown, DE.


Dear Counsel:

This letter contains my decision on plaintiffs' amended motion for a temporary restraining order filed on March 5, 2004. For the reasons set out briefly below, the motion is denied.

A hearing was held on the motion in my Chambers pursuant to 10 Del. C. § 344, on Monday, March 15, 2004. I advised counsel of my ruling at the end of the hearing. This letter memorializes my ruling for the record.

The plaintiffs own and reside on property in Sussex County near Lewes. The plaintiffs, along with another property owner, have an ownership interest in a private road adjacent to their property. The defendants also own and reside on property that is adjacent to this private road. The defendants' ownership interest in the road, however, is a subject of dispute — specifically, an ongoing ejectment action in Superior Court.

After plaintiffs initiated the ejectment action in Superior Court, the defendants dumped clamshells, accompanied by the carcasses of fish and chickens, on the private road. While the clamshells remain, the other organic debris has been conveniently removed by the local bird population (more precisely, by a congregation of cathartes aura and coragyps atratus, or turkey vultures and black vultures). Before me is the plaintiffs' request that this Court order the defendants to promptly remove the clamshells.

Although the dumping of the clamshells on the private road was certainly unneighborly and clearly annoying, it does not rise to the level of "imminent, irreparable harm" as required under Delaware's jurisprudence. There is perhaps even a colorable argument that the spreading of clamshells on the road (a standard way of improving unpaved roads in Sussex County) caused no harm at all. To the extent that the noxious odor of decaying carcasses constituted an irreparable harm, nature provided a prompt solution.

See, e.g., Village of Manley Civic Ass'n v. Becker, 1997 Del. Ch. LEXIS 176, at *10 (Del.Ch. Dec. 17, 1997).

Any harm caused by the placement of clamshells is remediable with money damages. Accordingly, the motion for a temporary restraining order is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rossi v. Brockway

Court of Chancery of Delaware
Mar 16, 2004
Civil Action No. 290-S (Del. Ch. Mar. 16, 2004)
Case details for

Rossi v. Brockway

Case Details

Full title:Rossi, et al. v. Brockway, et al

Court:Court of Chancery of Delaware

Date published: Mar 16, 2004

Citations

Civil Action No. 290-S (Del. Ch. Mar. 16, 2004)