From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
May 31, 2023
361 So. 3d 434 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023)

Opinion

No. 1D21-3908

05-31-2023

Ramon Rechaye ROSS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Tyler Kemper Payne, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kristie Regan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Tyler Kemper Payne, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kristie Regan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Ray, J.

Ramon Ross was convicted after a jury trial of two counts of sexual battery without the use of physical force and violence likely to cause serious personal injury. He was sentenced to concurrent terms of fifteen years in prison followed by fifteen years on sex offender probation for each count.

On appeal, he challenges his convictions and sentences on three grounds. As to the second and third grounds, we affirm without further discussion. But as to the first ground, the State concedes that Ross was erroneously sentenced for two first-degree felonies when he was only convicted of second-degree felonies. See § 794.011(5)(b), Fla. Stat. (2018). The statutory maximum sentence for a second-degree felony is fifteen years in prison. § 775.082(3)(d), Fla. Stat. (2018). A probationary split sentence that exceeds the maximum period of incarceration provided for by statute is an illegal sentence. See State v. Holmes , 360 So. 2d 380, 383 (Fla. 1978) (holding, among other things, "that a trial judge is authorized by Section 948.01(4) to sentence a defendant to a period of incarceration followed by a period of probation" and "that the combined periods at the time of the original sentence cannot exceed the maximum period of incarceration provided by statute for the offense charged"). Therefore, Ross’ thirty-year sentences on each count are illegal. Based upon the State's proper concession of error, we vacate the sentences and remand for resentencing.

The relevant provisions of section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1975), are now found in section 948.012, Florida Statutes.

Judgment AFFIRMED ; sentencing order VACATED ; REMANDED for resentencing.

Osterhaus and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ross v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
May 31, 2023
361 So. 3d 434 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023)
Case details for

Ross v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ramon Rechaye Ross, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: May 31, 2023

Citations

361 So. 3d 434 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023)