Ross v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit Dist.

Full title: GEORGE W. ROSS, JR., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA…

Court: California Court of Appeals, First District, First Division

Date published: Feb 20, 2007

No. A110543 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 20, 2007)

Opinion

Page 837a

147 Cal.App.4th 837a __ Cal.Rptr.3d __ GEORGE W. ROSS, JR., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, Defendant and Respondent. A110543 California Court of Appeal, First District, First Division February 20, 2007

Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG 03113907.

THE COURT

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on January 24, 2007 (146 Cal.App.4th 1507; ___Cal.Rptr.3d___ ), be modified as follows, and the petition for rehearing is DENIED:

1. On page 3 [146 Cal.App.4th 1511, advance report, 1st full para.], replace the first sentence of the second full paragraph beginning “A disability specialist . . .” with the following sentence:

A psychiatrist recommended by BART’s insurance carrier concluded that Ross was partially disabled as the result of job stress arising out of the termination incident.

There is no change in the judgment.