From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosenstein v. Poulos

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Sep 10, 2009
No. 02-09-223-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 10, 2009)

Opinion

No. 02-09-223-CV

Delivered: September 10, 2009.

Appealed from the 231st District Court OF Tarrant County.

PANEL: MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MEIER, J.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


On August 11, 2009, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal had informed this court that arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk's record as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant, within fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk's record and provided this court with proof of payment.

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk's record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.


Summaries of

Rosenstein v. Poulos

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Sep 10, 2009
No. 02-09-223-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 10, 2009)
Case details for

Rosenstein v. Poulos

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD ROSENSTEIN APPELLANT v. BETH POULOS APPELLEE

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Sep 10, 2009

Citations

No. 02-09-223-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 10, 2009)