From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romero v. N. Shore Auto Repair, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 9 and 10 Judicial Dist.
Jul 27, 2015
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 51128 (N.Y. App. Term 2015)

Opinion

No. 2013–1943 N C.

07-27-2015

Olivia ROMERO, Respondent, v. NORTH SHORE AUTO REPAIR, INC., Appellant.


Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of Glen Cove, Nassau County (Joseph D. McCann, J.), entered April 1, 2013. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $1,300.

ORDERED that the judgment is modified by reducing the amount of the award to plaintiff to the principal sum of $82.10; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

In this small claims action, plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $2,000 for damage to her vehicle caused by defendant's allegedly negligent repairs. After a nonjury trial, the City Court awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $1,300.

The standard of review on an appeal of a small claims judgment is whether “substantial justice has ... been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law” (UCCA 1807). Pursuant to UCCA 1804, plaintiff was required to submit an itemized bill or invoice, receipted or marked paid, or two itemized estimates, as evidence of the reasonable value and necessity of each of the repairs. However, plaintiff submitted only one invoice, which was not marked paid, for each of two separate repairs to her vehicle. Thus, plaintiff failed to properly establish damages. Consequently, the judgment failed to provide the parties with substantial justice according to the rules and principles of substantive law (UCCA 1804, 1807; see Ross v. Friedman, 269 A.D.2d 584 2000; Williams v. Roper, 269 A.D.2d 125, 126 2000 ). However, as defendant has conceded its liability upon the invoice for the sum of $82.10, substantial justice between the parties requires that plaintiff be awarded the principal sum of $82.10.

Accordingly, the judgment is modified by reducing the amount of the award to plaintiff to the principal sum of $82.10.

MARANO, P.J., IANNACCI and TOLBERT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Romero v. N. Shore Auto Repair, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 9 and 10 Judicial Dist.
Jul 27, 2015
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 51128 (N.Y. App. Term 2015)
Case details for

Romero v. N. Shore Auto Repair, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Olivia ROMERO, Respondent, v. NORTH SHORE AUTO REPAIR, INC., Appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 9 and 10 Judicial Dist.

Date published: Jul 27, 2015

Citations

2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 51128 (N.Y. App. Term 2015)
20 N.Y.S.3d 294
2015 WL 4604465

Citing Cases

Sellathurai v. Systematic Control, Inc.

Where multiple services or repairs are required, in the absence of expert testimony to support a claim (cf.…

Sellathurai v. Systematic Control, Inc.

Under section 1804 of the Uniform District Court Act, "An itemized bill or invoice, receipted or marked paid,…