From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romero-Osorio v. Mukasey

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Feb 28, 2008
267 F. App'x 87 (2d Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-0003-ag.

February 28, 2008.

Petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying motion to reconsider.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the petition be and hereby is DISMISSED.

Anne Pilsbury, Central American Legal Assistance, Brooklyn, N.Y., for Petitioner.

Thomas H. Dupree, Jr. (Peter D. Keisler, James E. Grimes, Leslie McKay, of counsel) United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Present: Hon. ROBERT A. KATZMANN, Hon. BARRINGTON D. PARKER, Hon. REENA RAGGI, Circuit Judges.



SUMMARY ORDER

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reconsider. In re Ubaldo Romero-Osorio, No. A98 422 154 (B.I.A. Feb. 15, 2007). After oral argument in this case, the petitioner and the government filed a joint motion to reopen with the BIA. The BIA granted the motion on February 6, 2008, reopened proceedings, changed venue to New York City, and remanded to the Immigration Judge to allow the petitioner to apply for voluntary departure. As the BIA has granted the motion to reopen, there is no longer a final order of removal for this Court to review. The petition for review is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1), (b)(9); see also Lopez-Ruiz v. Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 886, 887 (9th Cir. 2002).


Summaries of

Romero-Osorio v. Mukasey

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Feb 28, 2008
267 F. App'x 87 (2d Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Romero-Osorio v. Mukasey

Case Details

Full title:Ubaldo ROMERO-OSORIO, Petitioner, v. Page 88 Michael B. MUKASEY, United…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Feb 28, 2008

Citations

267 F. App'x 87 (2d Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Larin v. Garland

We do so both because we treat it as a motion to remand and consider new evidence, see 8 C.F.R. §…