From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rojas Barriga v. B. Cates

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 16, 2021
1:21-cv-01366-HBK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-01366-HBK

09-16-2021

JOSE ANTONIO ROJAS BARRIGA, Petitioner, v. B. CATES, Respondent.


ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(Doc. No. 1)

HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner is proceeding on his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 1). Petitioner is a prisoner incarcerated in Kern County, which is located within the jurisdiction and venue of this Court. Petitioner challenges his May 6, 2016 state sentence and conviction entered by the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County, which is located within the jurisdiction and venue of the Western Division of the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

The Petitioner also appears to make claims related to conditions of confinement and the Covid-19 pandemic, but these claims are not at the root of the habeas petition nor viable via a habeas petition.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d), jurisdiction is proper in the judicial district where the petitioner was convicted or where the petitioner is incarcerated. Therefore, both the Central District of California and the Eastern District of California have concurrent jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 428 (2004). However, “[f]or the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought.” 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Federal courts in California generally hear petitions for writ of habeas corpus in the district of conviction. Favor v. California, No. 116-CV-01912-DAD-EPG-HC, 2017 WL 2671006, at *1 (E.D. Cal. June 21, 2017) (citing Laue v. Nelson, 279 F.Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968).

Thus, the Court finds in its discretion “and in furtherance of justice” the petition should be transferred to the Central District of California. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1404(a), 2241(d).

Accordingly,

1. The Clerk shall transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division; and 2. All future filings shall reference the new case number assigned and shall be filed at: United States District Court Central District of California Western Division 255 East Temple Street Los Angeles, CA 90012-3332


Summaries of

Rojas Barriga v. B. Cates

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 16, 2021
1:21-cv-01366-HBK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Rojas Barriga v. B. Cates

Case Details

Full title:JOSE ANTONIO ROJAS BARRIGA, Petitioner, v. B. CATES, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 16, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-01366-HBK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2021)