From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rohillco Bus. Servs., LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Jul 25, 2016
No. 3:15-cv-02270-SB (D. Or. Jul. 25, 2016)

Opinion

No. 3:15-cv-02270-SB

07-25-2016

ROHILLCO BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC, and GAP FUNDING COMPANY, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER MOSMAN, J.,

On June 24, 2016, Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued her Findings and Recommendation (F&R) [29], recommending the Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim [12] should be GRANTED. No objections to the Findings and Recommendation were filed.

DISCUSSION

The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

Upon review, I agree with Judge Beckerman's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R [29] as my own opinion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 25 day of July, 2016.

/s/ Michael W. Mosman

MICHAEL W. MOSMAN

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rohillco Bus. Servs., LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Jul 25, 2016
No. 3:15-cv-02270-SB (D. Or. Jul. 25, 2016)
Case details for

Rohillco Bus. Servs., LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:ROHILLCO BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC, and GAP FUNDING COMPANY, LLC, Plaintiffs…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Date published: Jul 25, 2016

Citations

No. 3:15-cv-02270-SB (D. Or. Jul. 25, 2016)

Citing Cases

The Deaconess Ass'ns, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank

Under Oregon law, even the “borrower-lender and bank-depositor relationships fail to give rise to a special…