From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Epstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 13, 1997
244 A.D.2d 202 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

November 13, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.).


The action, which is based on plaintiff's lack of informed consent to an abortion performed by defendant, was properly dismissed on the ground that Public Health Law § 2805-d does not require physicians to refer patients to counseling on alternatives to abortion or to provide such counseling to patients seeking elective abortions (see, Perez v. Park Madison Professional Labs., 212 A.D.2d 271, 274; compare, Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833, 881-885, 902).

We have considered plaintiff's other arguments and in the circumstances find them to be without merit.

Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Epstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 13, 1997
244 A.D.2d 202 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Epstein

Case Details

Full title:HELEN RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. SALOMON N. EPSTEIN, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 13, 1997

Citations

244 A.D.2d 202 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
664 N.Y.S.2d 20

Citing Cases

Gallegos v. City of New York

Specific to abortions, Public Health Law § 2805-d does not require physicians to refer patients to counseling…