From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. City of Los Angeles

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 4, 2003
71 F. App'x 733 (9th Cir. 2003)

Opinion


71 Fed.Appx. 733 (9th Cir. 2003) Cairo D. RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff--Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a Municipality, Defendant, and Lee Zorne, individually; et al., Defendants--Appellees. No. 02-56774. D.C. No. CV-99-13441-ABC. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. August 4, 2003

Submitted June 13, 2003.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Audrey B. Collins, District Judge, Presiding.

Before SKOPIL, FERGUSON, and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Cairo D. Rodriguez appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the City of Los Angeles, dismissing his second amended complaint alleging discrimination, violation of civil rights, racketeering, and other claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and our review is de novo. See Weiner v. San Diego County, 210 F.3d 1025, 1028 (9th Cir.2000).

For the reasons set forth in the district court's comprehensive order entered on June 25, 2002, we affirm the summary judgment.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. City of Los Angeles

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 4, 2003
71 F. App'x 733 (9th Cir. 2003)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. City of Los Angeles

Case Details

Full title:Cairo D. RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff--Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 4, 2003

Citations

71 F. App'x 733 (9th Cir. 2003)