From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. Jenkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1900
52 App. Div. 491 (N.Y. App. Div. 1900)

Opinion

June Term, 1900.

Michael Schaap, for the appellant.

Thomas C. Ennever, for the respondent.

Present — VAN BRUNT, P.J., RUMSEY, PATTERSON, INGRAHAM and McLAUGHLIN, JJ.


The order denying a motion for a preference of this cause upon the calendar must be affirmed. The pleadings in the action are not in the record, nor is there anything from which we are able to determine that the plaintiff is entitled to the statutory preference claimed. That right cannot be inferred simply from the title of an action.

The order must be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

Roberts v. Jenkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1900
52 App. Div. 491 (N.Y. App. Div. 1900)
Case details for

Roberts v. Jenkins

Case Details

Full title:ANNIE A. ROBERTS, as Administratrix, etc., of DAVID H. ROBERTS, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1900

Citations

52 App. Div. 491 (N.Y. App. Div. 1900)

Citing Cases

Marando v. Gillespie Co.

Such right cannot be inferred solely from the title of the action. ( Roberts v. Jenkins, 52 App. Div. 491.)…