From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marando v. Gillespie Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 1900
54 App. Div. 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 1900)

Opinion

November Term, 1900.

Thomas J. O'Neill, for the appellant.

Wilbur L. Ball, for the respondent.

Present — VAN BRUNT, P.J., RUMSEY, PATTERSON, O'BRIEN and McLAUGHLIN, JJ.


The order appealed from must be affirmed. The record before us does not contain the pleadings in the action, nor is there anything in it from which we are able to determine that the plaintiff is entitled to the preference claimed. Such right cannot be inferred solely from the title of the action. ( Roberts v. Jenkins, 52 App. Div. 491.)

The order must be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

Marando v. Gillespie Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 1900
54 App. Div. 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 1900)
Case details for

Marando v. Gillespie Co.

Case Details

Full title:DOMENICO MARANDO, Administrator, etc., of ANTONIO CANTANZARITE, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1900

Citations

54 App. Div. 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 1900)
66 N.Y.S. 1027

Citing Cases

Jackson v. Jackson

The defendant opposes the motion on the ground that no copy of the pleadings or affidavit was annexed to the…