From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rigsby v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Jul 13, 2005
No. 09-04-457 CR (Tex. App. Jul. 13, 2005)

Opinion

No. 09-04-457 CR

Submitted on May 31, 2005.

Opinion Delivered July 13, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Appeal from the 159th District Court Angelina County, Texas, Trial Cause No. 24121. Affirmed.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., GAULTNEY and HORTON, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Tex.R.App.P. 47.4.


A jury found Etoyle Rigsby guilty of evading detention. Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 38.04(b)(1) (Vernon 2003). After the defendant pleaded "true" to being a habitual felony offender, the jury assessed punishment at six years of confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division. Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 12.42 (a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2005). The brief filed by Rigsby's appellate counsel concludes no arguable error is presented in this appeal. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978). On February 3, 2005, we granted an extension of time for Rigsby to file a pro se brief. We received no response from the appellant. We have reviewed the entire record, and find no error that will arguably support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991). The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Rigsby v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Jul 13, 2005
No. 09-04-457 CR (Tex. App. Jul. 13, 2005)
Case details for

Rigsby v. State

Case Details

Full title:ETOYLE RIGSBY, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Jul 13, 2005

Citations

No. 09-04-457 CR (Tex. App. Jul. 13, 2005)