From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richter v. Dunlap

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 28, 1995
214 A.D.2d 983 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

April 28, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Niagara County, Mintz, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Lawton, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendants' motion. Plaintiff failed to provide a sufficient excuse for her failure to file a note of issue within the 90-day demand period (see, Terry v Southern Container, 214 A.D.2d 983 [decided herewith]; Franck v CNY Anesthesia Group, 175 A.D.2d 605; MacLeod v Nolte, 106 A.D.2d 860; Barnard v Tops Friendly Mkts., 99 A.D.2d 654), and her attorney's affidavit, which contained only conclusory allegations of merit, is insufficient to demonstrate a meritorious cause of action (see, Terry v Southern Container, supra; Freer v Black, 175 A.D.2d 577, lv denied 78 N.Y.2d 862; Zent v Board of Educ., 174 A.D.2d 1047, 1048).


Summaries of

Richter v. Dunlap

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 28, 1995
214 A.D.2d 983 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Richter v. Dunlap

Case Details

Full title:JAMIE L. RICHTER, Respondent, v. ELNORA DUNLAP et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 28, 1995

Citations

214 A.D.2d 983 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
627 N.Y.S.2d 604

Citing Cases

Terry v. Southern Container

To defeat the motion, plaintiff had to show a justifiable excuse for failure to file a note of issue within…

Middleton v. John Luther and Son

Supreme Court abused its discretion in granting the motion of plaintiff for an extension of time to file a…