From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barnard v. Tops Friendly Markets

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 27, 1984
99 A.D.2d 654 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

January 27, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Tillman, J.

Present — Hancock, Jr., J.P., Doerr, Green, O'Donnell and Moule, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: CPLR 3216 (subd [a]) authorizes a court to dismiss a complaint when it finds that a party has unreasonably neglected to prosecute his claim. It was incumbent upon plaintiff to offer a justifiable excuse for the almost 21-month delay between service of the demand to file a note of issue and the motion to dismiss the action. Plaintiff's offered excuse that there was an appeal pending in a companion cause of action is unavailing. While the pendency of an appeal in some instances will excuse the delay in going forward (see Chuttick v Collins, 24 A.D.2d 540), the appeal upon which plaintiff relies was not perfected until 20 days after service of the notice of motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute. Special Term did not abuse its discretion in finding that this delay was unreasonable.


Summaries of

Barnard v. Tops Friendly Markets

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 27, 1984
99 A.D.2d 654 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Barnard v. Tops Friendly Markets

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND J. BARNARD et al., Appellants, v. TOPS FRIENDLY MARKETS et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 27, 1984

Citations

99 A.D.2d 654 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

Richter v. Dunlap

Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendants' motion. Plaintiff failed to provide a sufficient…

McCargar v. Welser

We note, however, that the statutory enactment, which was intended to relieve the oftentimes harsh results…