Opinion
June 8, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Di Tucci, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the defendants' contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in excusing the plaintiff's approximately two-month delay in complying with the conditional order of preclusion (see, Glen Travel Plaza v Anderson Equip. Corp., 122 A.D.2d 327; Wilenski v. Auricchio Monuments, 102 A.D.2d 824). The plaintiff established a reasonable excuse for her delay (see, Mariani v. Fleishman, 160 A.D.2d 911; Glen Travel Plaza v. Anderson Equip. Corp., supra; Heffney v Brookdale Hosp. Ctr., 102 A.D.2d 842), and the verified bill of particulars indicated the merits of the action (see, Darrell v Yurchuk, 174 A.D.2d 557). Moreover, the defendants have raised no claim that they were prejudiced by the delay, and there is no indication that the plaintiff intended to abandon the action (see, Darrell v. Yurchuk, supra; Caggiano v. Ross, 130 A.D.2d 538). Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Eiber and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.