Summary
recommending denial of further leave to amend because the plaintiff had already had multiple opportunities to do so and failed to cure the pleading deficiencies
Summary of this case from Johnson v. St. Helena Sch. Dist.Opinion
Civil Action 20-419-SDD-EWD
01-18-2022
RICHARD v. HOOPER, ET AL.
RULING
SHELLY D. DICK, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
The Court has carefully considered the Complaints, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes, dated December 29, 2021, to which no opposition was filed.
Rec. Docs. 1 and 6.
Rec. Doc. 11.
The Court hereby approves the Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein.
ACCORDINGLY,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's federal claims are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any state law claims and this case shall be CLOSED. As Plaintiff has already amended his Complaint once and was given an opportunity to amend again which he did not take;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any further leave to amend will be denied, if sought.