From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rhodes v. Stanislaus

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 28, 2008
290 F. App'x 980 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-17042.

Submitted August 25, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed August 28, 2008.

Alvis Vernon Rhodes, Modesto, CA, pro se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Oliver W. Wanger, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-07-01050-OWW.

Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

On July 24, 2008, this court ordered appellant to show cause as to why the district court's judgment should not be summarily affirmed for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations of August 3, 2007, 2007 WL 2254409.

A review of appellant's response to the court's order to show cause and the record indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Rhodes v. Stanislaus

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 28, 2008
290 F. App'x 980 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Rhodes v. Stanislaus

Case Details

Full title:Alvis Vernon RHODES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STANISLAUS COUNTY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 28, 2008

Citations

290 F. App'x 980 (9th Cir. 2008)