From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rhodes v. Howle

Supreme Court of Mississippi
Nov 23, 1953
67 So. 2d 877 (Miss. 1953)

Opinion

No. 38963.

November 23, 1953.

1. Boundaries — adverse possession — evidence — sufficient — to establish boundary line — title to disputed strip of land.

In suit involving title to land between fence separating adjoining lands of parties and what was claimed to be the true boundary line, evidence amply sustained Chancellor's findings that fence had been in its then location and recognized by owners of adjoining tracts as boundary line between them for more than ten years and that party claiming title by adverse possession to land in dispute had been in open, notorious, adverse, continuous, peaceable and uninterrupted possession of such land for more than ten years, and such finding was conclusive on appeal.

Headnote as approved by Hall, J.

APPEAL from the chancery court of Neshoba County; J.K. GILLIS, Chancellor.

Kenneth I. Franks, W.T. Weir, Philadelphia, for appellant.

Sanford Alford, Philadelphia, for appellees.


Appellant has record title to the North 30 acres of SW 1/4 of NE 1/4 of Section 13, Township 9, Range 11, in Neshoba County. Appellee, John R. Howle, has record title to the South 10 acres of the same forty acre subdivision. A fence running approximately East and West separates the two tracts. Between this fence and what is claimed to be the true line between the parties there is a tract of 1.547 acres. This suit involves the question whether this fence has been in its present location and recognized as the line between the parties for more than ten years and whether Howle has acquired title by adverse possession of that part of the North 30 acres of said forty which lies South of said fence.

(Hn 1) The record discloses a sharp dispute in the evidence as to whether this fence has been in its present location for more than ten years and whether appellee, Howle, has acquired title up to the fence by adverse possession. The chancellor found as a fact that the fence has existed in its present location since prior to 1935, that the owners of the tracts on each side of the fence have recognized it as the boundary line between them, and that Howle has been in the open, notorious, adverse, continuous, peaceable and uninterrupted possession of the land South of the fence for more than ten years. His finding is amply supported by the evidence and we are not authorized to disturb it.

Affirmed.

Roberds, P.J., and Lee, Kyle and Holmes, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rhodes v. Howle

Supreme Court of Mississippi
Nov 23, 1953
67 So. 2d 877 (Miss. 1953)
Case details for

Rhodes v. Howle

Case Details

Full title:RHODES v. HOWLE, et al

Court:Supreme Court of Mississippi

Date published: Nov 23, 1953

Citations

67 So. 2d 877 (Miss. 1953)
67 So. 2d 877

Citing Cases

McCallum v. Laird

III. That there is no equity in the judgment and decree rendered by the Chancellor in this cause. Collation…

Hulbert v. Fayard

Ball v. City of Louisville, 218 Miss. 867, 56 So.2d 4; Bell v. Percy, 214 Miss. 456, 59 So.2d 76; Boyd v.…