From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reynolds v. International-Harvester Company

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 30, 1956
233 F.2d 959 (6th Cir. 1956)

Opinion

No. 12662.

April 30, 1956.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Cleveland; Paul Jones, Judge.

S. Eldridge Sampliner, Cleveland, Ohio, Harvey Goldstein, New York City, for appellant.

Johnson, Branard Jaeger, Cleveland, Ohio, Bradley, Pipin, Vetter Eaton, Chicago, Ill., for appellee.

Before MARTIN, McALLISTER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.


The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of record, the briefs of the parties, and argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the district court be and is hereby affirmed in accordance with the memorandum opinion, 141 F. Supp. 371 of Judge Jones.


Summaries of

Reynolds v. International-Harvester Company

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 30, 1956
233 F.2d 959 (6th Cir. 1956)
Case details for

Reynolds v. International-Harvester Company

Case Details

Full title:Harvey Jack REYNOLDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL-HARVESTER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Apr 30, 1956

Citations

233 F.2d 959 (6th Cir. 1956)

Citing Cases

Matter of Silver Mill Frozen Foods, Inc.

A consent judgment can have res judicata effect so long as the judgment, as here, was entered with prejudice.…

LaFollette v. Herron

Prior to the Pre-Trial, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that "the subject matter…