From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reynolds v. International Harvester Company

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D
Jun 20, 1955
141 F. Supp. 371 (N.D. Ohio 1955)

Opinion

Civ. No. 31309.

June 20, 1955.

S. Eldridge Sampliner, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Robert Branand, Johnson, Branand Jaeger, Cleveland, Ohio, Stuart B. Bradley, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.


This action was commenced under Section 33 of the Merchant Marine Act of 1920, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688, the Jones Act, to recover damages for injury to the complainant allegedly caused by the negligence of the defendant and the unseaworthiness of its vessel.

Defendant moves the court for judgment on the pleadings.

It appearing that the same issues were formerly raised between the same parties in Civil No. 53 C 297 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, and that on stipulation of the parties, in which plaintiff's attorney joined, an order was entered dismissing the case with prejudice and without costs, the order there entered is res judicata as to this action.

If plaintiff is entitled to any relief it must be in the Illinois court, the proceedings and judgment in which may not be attacked collaterally here.

Accordingly, defendant's motion must be and is granted.


Summaries of

Reynolds v. International Harvester Company

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D
Jun 20, 1955
141 F. Supp. 371 (N.D. Ohio 1955)
Case details for

Reynolds v. International Harvester Company

Case Details

Full title:Harvey Jack REYNOLDS, Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER COMPANY…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D

Date published: Jun 20, 1955

Citations

141 F. Supp. 371 (N.D. Ohio 1955)

Citing Cases

United States v. Eastport Steamship Corp.

In the absence of such litigation and a consequent determination of the merits by that court, the judgment…

United States Fidelity Guaranty Co. v. Maish

The Rule does not require that the case be tried on the merits; it simply requires that the counterclaim be…