From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rembert v. Annucci

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 1, 2020
16 CIVIL 7490 (CS) (PED) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2020)

Opinion

16 CIVIL 7490 (CS) (PED)

12-01-2020

PAUL REMBERT, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, Acting Commissioner, New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memo-Endorsed Order dated December 1, 2020, no objections to the Report and Recommendation (the "R&R") have been received, and the Court therefore reviewed it for clear error. Finding no error, clear or otherwise, the R&R is adopted as the decision of the Court. The petition is denied in its entirety. As Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and reasonable jurists would not find that conclusion debatable, no certificate of appealability will issue; accordingly, the case is closed. DATED: New York, New York

December 1, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Rembert v. Annucci

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 1, 2020
16 CIVIL 7490 (CS) (PED) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2020)
Case details for

Rembert v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:PAUL REMBERT, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, Acting Commissioner, New…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Dec 1, 2020

Citations

16 CIVIL 7490 (CS) (PED) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2020)

Citing Cases

Olivo v. Graham

On habeas review, the petitioner must show that the denial of a motion for a mistrial deprived him [or her]…

Murphy v. Warden of Attica Corr. Facility

Because the admission of these statements was not erroneous, it could work no violation of Murphy's right to…