From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reid v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 29, 2009
No. 08-cv-02894-MCE-GGH P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-cv-02894-MCE-GGH P.

April 29, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On March 6, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 6, 2009, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is administratively stayed pending the Ninth Circuit's decision in Hayward v. Marshall, 512 F.3d 536 (9th Cir. 2008), reh'g en banc granted, ___ F.3d ___, No. 06-55392 (9th Cir. filed May 16, 2008).


Summaries of

Reid v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 29, 2009
No. 08-cv-02894-MCE-GGH P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2009)
Case details for

Reid v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN REID, Petitioner, v. D.K. SISTO, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 29, 2009

Citations

No. 08-cv-02894-MCE-GGH P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2009)