From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hayward v. Marshall

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 16, 2008
527 F.3d 797 (9th Cir. 2008)

Summary

granting rehearing en banc

Summary of this case from Molina v. Curry

Opinion

No. 06-55392.

May 16, 2008.

Joseph V. Camarata, Law Office of Joseph V. Camarata, Vallejo, CA, Michael Satris, Bolinas, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Julie L. Garland, AGCA-Office of the California, Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.


ORDER


Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.


Summaries of

Hayward v. Marshall

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 16, 2008
527 F.3d 797 (9th Cir. 2008)

granting rehearing en banc

Summary of this case from Molina v. Curry
Case details for

Hayward v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:Ronald HAYWARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John MARSHALL, California Men's…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 16, 2008

Citations

527 F.3d 797 (9th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

MILOT v. HAWS

See Irons v. Carey, 505 F.3d. 846, 850 (9th Cir. 2007) (as amended), denial of rehearing en banc at 506 F.3d…

McCray v. Kernan

Pursuant to the court's March 26, 2008, order, petitioner filed a supplemental brief (Doc. 47). Respondents…