From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reid v. Donald Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 27, 2007
43 A.D.3d 1258 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 501878.

September 27, 2007.

Prisons and Prisoners — Discipline of Inmates Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Cedric Reid, Auburn, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur.


Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with making threats and harassment after he sent to the Commissioner of Correctional Services a letter containing offensive and obscene references. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of both charges. That determination was affirmed on administrative appeal with a modified penalty, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, subject correspondence, corroborating hearing testimony and petitioner's own admission that he authored and sent the letter constitute substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Canzater-Smith v Selsky, 28 AD3d 899, 900). To the extent that petitioner offered an innocent explanation regarding the content of the letter and a retaliation defense, credibility issues were created for resolution by the Hearing Officer ( see Matter of Rizzuto v Goord, 35 AD3d 1075, 1075). Contrary to petitioner's assertion, the offending references were not protected expressions under the 1st Amendment of the US Constitution ( see Matter of Jones v Department of Correctional Servs. of State of N.Y., 283 AD2d 805, 805-806 [2001]). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be unpersuasive.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Reid v. Donald Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 27, 2007
43 A.D.3d 1258 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Reid v. Donald Selsky

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CEDRIC REID, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as Director of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 27, 2007

Citations

43 A.D.3d 1258 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 7043
842 N.Y.S.2d 113

Citing Cases

In re James Pettus

We affirm. The misbehavior report, the letter and the testimony of the correction officer to whom it was…

Edward Koehl v. Brian Fischer

Petitioner's claim that he did not author the letter presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to…