From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 13, 2005
No. CIV S-05-1467 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2005)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-1467 FCD DAD P.

September 13, 2005


ORDER


On August 31, 2005, petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus was dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust state court remedies. Judgment was entered and the case was closed. On September 1, 2005, the court received petitioner's untimely objections to the findings and recommendations that were filed on July 29, 2005. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's untimely objections will be disregarded.

Petitioner was required to deliver his objections to prison officials for mailing on or before August 23, 2005. The proof of service attached to petitioner's objections reveals that the document was mailed on August 28, 2005.


Summaries of

Reed v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 13, 2005
No. CIV S-05-1467 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2005)
Case details for

Reed v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO D. REED, Petitioner, v. D.L. RUNNELS, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 13, 2005

Citations

No. CIV S-05-1467 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2005)