From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reece v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 1, 2010
No. 2:08-cv-00488-JKS (E.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2010)

Opinion

No. 2:08-cv-00488-JKS.

July 1, 2010


ORDER


At Docket No. 14 this Court entered its Order granting Respondent's motion to stay further proceedings in this case pending the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Hayward v. Marshall. In that Order the Court directed Respondent to serve and file an answer to the petition within 60 days after the Ninth Circuit en banc panel issued its mandate. The Ninth Circuit rendered its decision on April 22, 2010 and issued its Mandate on June 10, 2010.

512 F.3d 536, reh'g en banc granted, 527 F.3d 797 (9th Cir. 2008)

Hayward v. Marshall, 603 F.3d 546 (9th Cir. 2010) (en banc).

Accordingly, Respondent's answer is due on or before August 9, 2010. Reece may file a reply to the answer not later than 30 days after Respondent serves and files his answer.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Reece v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 1, 2010
No. 2:08-cv-00488-JKS (E.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2010)
Case details for

Reece v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES G. REECE, Petitioner, v. D. K. SISTO, Warden, California State…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 1, 2010

Citations

No. 2:08-cv-00488-JKS (E.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2010)