From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reece v. CitiMortgage, Inc.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Mar 22, 2012
NO. 02-11-00343-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 22, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 02-11-00343-CV

03-22-2012

JOE REECE APPELLANT v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC. APPELLEE


FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On February 27, 2012, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

Reece v. CitiMortgage, Inc.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Mar 22, 2012
NO. 02-11-00343-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 22, 2012)
Case details for

Reece v. CitiMortgage, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOE REECE APPELLANT v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC. APPELLEE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Mar 22, 2012

Citations

NO. 02-11-00343-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 22, 2012)