From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reconstruction Fin. Corp. v. Deihl

Supreme Court of Iowa
May 6, 1941
229 Iowa 1276 (Iowa 1941)

Opinion

No. 44909.

February 18, 1941. Supplemental Opinion on Rehearing May 6, 1941.

Appeal from Louisa District Court. — OSCAR HALE, Judge.


Since the original decision in this case, all parties before the court have entered into a stipulation of settlement, copy of which is on file with the clerk of this court. The parties jointly have petitioned for a rehearing and the court finds that such rehearing should be granted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that rehearing is granted as prayed and that as a result thereof the cause is remanded to the district court for a decree in conformity to the terms of the stipulation and in accordance with the provisions of chapter 358.2 (formerly chapter 358-F1) of the Code.

MILLER, SAGER, STIGER, BLISS, and WENNERSTRUM, JJ., concur.

HALE, C.J., takes no part.


Summaries of

Reconstruction Fin. Corp. v. Deihl

Supreme Court of Iowa
May 6, 1941
229 Iowa 1276 (Iowa 1941)
Case details for

Reconstruction Fin. Corp. v. Deihl

Case Details

Full title:RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION et al., Appellants, v. S.J. DEIHL et…

Court:Supreme Court of Iowa

Date published: May 6, 1941

Citations

229 Iowa 1276 (Iowa 1941)
296 N.W. 385

Citing Cases

Vaudt v. Wells Fargo Bank

Est. of Cawiezell v. Coronelli, 958 N.W.2d 842, 848 (Iowa 2021); see Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808, 828…

Thorn v. Home Inv'rs 12

"It is elementary that a tax title is not derivative but is a new and independent title in the nature of a…