Opinion
No. 09-73832 Agency No. A078-020-447
09-18-2012
STENLY LALOAN RANTUNG, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Stenly Laloan Rantung, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' order denying his motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition for review.
Rantung's only argument is that his case should be remanded for the agency to assess his withholding of removal claim under the disfavored group analysis. We reject Rantung's argument in light of our prior decision, Rantung v. Mukasey, No. 05-75377, 2008 WL 4155280 (9th Cir. Sept. 10, 2008), in which this court applied the disfavored group analysis to Rantung's withholding of removal claim and rejected his claim. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.