From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramsey v. Sunset Mortg.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Aug 29, 2013
NO. 02-13-00206-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 29, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 02-13-00206-CV

08-29-2013

NATASHA RAMSEY APPELLANT v. SUNSET MORTGAGE, ITS ASSIGNS AND/OR SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST, ITS AFFIANTS' AND U.S. PERSONS OF INTEREST, JP COURT NO. 1, COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO.1 TARRANT COUNTY CONSTABLES PCT 7 APPELLEES


FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On August 13, 2013, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court that payment arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk's record as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant, within ten days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk's record and provided this court with proof of payment.

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk's record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

Ramsey v. Sunset Mortg.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Aug 29, 2013
NO. 02-13-00206-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 29, 2013)
Case details for

Ramsey v. Sunset Mortg.

Case Details

Full title:NATASHA RAMSEY APPELLANT v. SUNSET MORTGAGE, ITS ASSIGNS AND/OR SUCCESSORS…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Aug 29, 2013

Citations

NO. 02-13-00206-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 29, 2013)