From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rainwater v. Carling on Frankford

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Nov 22, 2017
NO. 02-17-00191-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 22, 2017)

Opinion

NO. 02-17-00191-CV

11-22-2017

BRANDI RAINWATER APPELLANT v. THE CARLING ON FRANKFORD APPELLEE


FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF DENTON COUNTY
TRIAL COURT NO. CV-2017-01174 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On October 9, 2017, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant filed with the court within ten days an appellant's brief and a motion reasonably explaining the failure to file an appellant's brief and the need for an extension. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have not received any response.

Because appellant has failed to file a brief after having been given an opportunity to provide a reasonable explanation for the failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM PANEL: SUDDERTH, C.J.; WALKER and MEIER, JJ. DELIVERED: November 22, 2017


Summaries of

Rainwater v. Carling on Frankford

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Nov 22, 2017
NO. 02-17-00191-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 22, 2017)
Case details for

Rainwater v. Carling on Frankford

Case Details

Full title:BRANDI RAINWATER APPELLANT v. THE CARLING ON FRANKFORD APPELLEE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Nov 22, 2017

Citations

NO. 02-17-00191-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 22, 2017)