From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rainey v. Rainey

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Aug 18, 2023
No. CL-2023-0011 (Ala. Civ. App. Aug. 18, 2023)

Opinion

CL-2023-0011

08-18-2023

Brandon Rainey v. Aimee Turner Rainey.


Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (DR-22-900179).

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(A), Ala. R. App. P.; Rule 28, Ala. R. App. P.; § 30-2-57(c), Ala. Code 1975; § 30-3-151(3), Ala. Code 1975; Magers v. Alabama Women's Ctr. Reprod. Alternatives, LLC, 325 So.3d 788, 790 (Ala. 2020); State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Bennett, 974 So.2d 959, 962 (Ala. 2007); Ex parte Fann, 810 So.2d 631, 636 (Ala. 2001); Spradlin v. Birmingham Airport Auth., 613 So.2d 347, 348 (Ala.1993); May v. May, 292 So.3d 385, 389 (Ala. Civ. App. 2019); Rodgers v. Rodgers, 231 So.3d 1090 (Ala. Civ. App. 2016); K.W.M. v. P.N.M., 116 So.3d 1179, 1185-87 (Ala. Civ. App. 2013); Lackey v. Lackey, 18 So.3d 393, 402 (Ala. Civ. App. 2009); D.B. v. J.E.H.. 984 So.2d 459, 462 (Ala. Civ. App. 2007); Nye v. Nye, 785 So.2d 1147, 1148-49 (Ala. Civ. App. 2000); Hutchins v. Hutchins, 637 So.2d 1371, 1373-74 (Ala. Civ. App. 1994); Yellow Freight Sys., Inc. v. Green, 612 So.2d 1209, 1211 (Ala. Civ. App. 1992); and Bishop v. Robinson, 516 So.2d 723, 724 (Ala. Civ. App. 1987).

The wife's request for damages pursuant to Rule 38, Ala. R. App. P., is denied.

Moore, Edwards, Hanson, and Fridy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rainey v. Rainey

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Aug 18, 2023
No. CL-2023-0011 (Ala. Civ. App. Aug. 18, 2023)
Case details for

Rainey v. Rainey

Case Details

Full title:Brandon Rainey v. Aimee Turner Rainey.

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Aug 18, 2023

Citations

No. CL-2023-0011 (Ala. Civ. App. Aug. 18, 2023)