From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Radin v. Mitchel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 14, 1995
221 A.D.2d 215 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 14, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.).


The motion was properly denied as plaintiffs' proposed amended complaint lacks the specificity required to state a cause of action for fraud (CPLR 3016 [b]; see, Bank Leumi Trust Co. v D'Evori Intl., 163 A.D.2d 26, 28). We note, however, that the relief plaintiff seeks, essentially an accounting of contingent fee cases in which the subject partnership had been retained prior to its December 31, 1986 dissolution, is cognizable under the fourth cause of action of the original complaint as pleaded and states a viable claim ( Raymond v Brimberg, 99 A.D.2d 988, 989; Shandell v Katz, 217 A.D.2d 472).

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Ross, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Radin v. Mitchel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 14, 1995
221 A.D.2d 215 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Radin v. Mitchel

Case Details

Full title:CARL RADIN, Appellant, v. ALVIN MITCHEL, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 14, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 215 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
633 N.Y.S.2d 953