Rader v. Dominion Ent. Pub.

Full title: TERRI OSBORNE RADER v. DOMINION ENTERPRISES TRADING PUBLISHING AND…

Court: Court of Appeals of Virginia

Date published: Mar 17, 2009

Record No. 2545-08-3 (Va. Ct. App. Mar. 17, 2009)

Opinion

Record No. 2545-08-3.

March 17, 2009.

Appeal from the Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission.

(James B. Feinman, on brief), for appellant.

(Robert M. Himmel; Lucas Kite, PLC, on brief), for appellees.

Present: Judges Frank, McClanahan and Retired Judge Hodges^_.

_ Retired Judge Hodges took part in the consideration of this case by designation pursuant to Code § 17.1-400(D).

MEMORANDUM OPINION^__

__ Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.

PER CURIAM.

Terri Osborne Rader appeals a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission finding that (a) her accident did not arise out of her employment, and (b) the deputy commissioner did not abuse her discretion in refusing to admit certain x-rays into evidence. We have reviewed the record and the commission's opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Rader v. Dominion Enterprises Trading Publishing, VWC File No. 231-77-32 (Oct. 8, 2008). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.