Opinion
NO. 01-20-00387-CV
07-07-2020
GUADALUPE S. QUINTANILLA, Appellant v. ROBERT MOSEQUEDA, JUAN SORIA MOSQUEDA, MARGARET SORIA, RITA SORIA VARGAS, ARTHUR SORIA, JESSIE G. SORIA, SARAH GARCIA, AND DORA DAMIAN, Appellees
On Appeal from the 149th District Court Brazoria County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 65349
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Guadalupe S. Quintanilla, has filed a petition for permissive appeal from an interlocutory order denying her motion for summary judgment. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 51.014(d), (f); TEX. R. CIV. P. 168; TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3. To be entitled to a permissive appeal from an interlocutory order that would not otherwise be appealable, the requesting party must establish that (1) the order to be appealed involves a "controlling question of law as to which there is a substantial ground for difference of opinion" and (2) an immediate appeal from the order "may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation." TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 51.014(d); see TEX. R. CIV. P. 168; TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3(e)(4). Quintanilla's petition for permissive appeal fails to establish these requirements. Accordingly, we deny the petition for permissive appeal.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Goodman, and Hightower.