From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quality Packaging Sup. Corp. v. R.H. Carlson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 2, 1990
158 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

February 2, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Siracuse, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Denman, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant's motion to vacate a default judgment because defendant failed to demonstrate a meritorious defense. The written confirmation and invoice which specified grade A material constituted a contract for the sale of goods (see, UCC 2-201). The terms of the agreement may not be contradicted by evidence of a prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement (see, UCC 2-202; Battista v Radesi, 112 A.D.2d 42).


Summaries of

Quality Packaging Sup. Corp. v. R.H. Carlson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 2, 1990
158 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Quality Packaging Sup. Corp. v. R.H. Carlson

Case Details

Full title:QUALITY PACKAGING SUPPLY CORP., Respondent, v. R.H. CARLSON CO., INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 2, 1990

Citations

158 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
551 N.Y.S.2d 99

Citing Cases

Antifun Ltd. v. Wayne Indus.

For both undelivered orders, Ruth and Wayne thus sent invoices to Antifun representing that they would…

Rienzi & Sons, Inc. v. I Buonatavola Sini S.R.L.

Indeed, New York courts routinely allow parties to sue under the N.Y.U.C.C. when a contract is merely…