From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Putzer v. Whorton

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Sep 21, 2010
3:07-cv-00498-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Sep. 21, 2010)

Opinion

3:07-cv-00498-LRH-RAM.

September 21, 2010


ORDER


Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid (#155) entered on August 9, 2010, recommending granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#124) filed on February 18, 2010, and denying Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (#131) filed on March 16, 2010, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 1B 3-2 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.

Refers to court's docket number.

The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#155) entered on August 9, 2010, should be adopted and accepted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#155) entered on August 9, 2010, is adopted and accepted, and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (#124) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (#131) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 17th day of September, 2010.


Summaries of

Putzer v. Whorton

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Sep 21, 2010
3:07-cv-00498-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Sep. 21, 2010)
Case details for

Putzer v. Whorton

Case Details

Full title:DAVID PUTZER, Plaintiff, v. GLEN WHORTON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Sep 21, 2010

Citations

3:07-cv-00498-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Sep. 21, 2010)