From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Putzer v. Donnelly

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Jun 16, 2010
3:07-cv-00620-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Jun. 16, 2010)

Opinion

3:07-cv-00620-LRH-VPC.

June 16, 2010


ORDER


Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke (#233) entered on May 11, 2010, recommending granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#170), and denying Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (#199). Plaintiff filed his Objection to the Report and Recommendation by U.S. Magistrate Judge Cooke (#238) on May 26, 2010.

Refers to court's docket number.

The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of the Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#233) entered on May 11, 2010, should be adopted and accepted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#233) entered on May 11, 2010, is adopted and accepted, and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#170) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (#199) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Putzer v. Donnelly

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Jun 16, 2010
3:07-cv-00620-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Jun. 16, 2010)
Case details for

Putzer v. Donnelly

Case Details

Full title:DAVID PUTZER, Plaintiff, v. JAMES DONNELLY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Jun 16, 2010

Citations

3:07-cv-00620-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Jun. 16, 2010)