From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pulsifer v. Eastman Kodak Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 29, 1995
219 A.D.2d 880 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

September 29, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Frazee, J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Lawton, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to plaintiffs in accordance with the following Memorandum:

Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment under Labor Law § 240 (1). Plaintiff Jerry Pulsifer was injured as he descended a ladder from one level of scaffolding to another, an activity covered by the statute (see, Brown v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 188 A.D.2d 1014). Unlike the plaintiff in Bonaparte v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. ( 188 A.D.2d 853), Pulsifer did not fall at the same level at which he had been working.

The court erred, however, in granting plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on liability under Labor Law § 240 (2). Although it is uncontroverted that the scaffolding lacked guardrails in contravention of the statute, plaintiffs did not show that the violation of the statute was a proximate cause of Pulsifer's injuries, inasmuch as Pulsifer was descending a ladder when he fell (see, Duda v Rouse Constr. Corp., 32 N.Y.2d 405, 410; Knight v Conopco, 216 A.D.2d 893; Rossi v Main-South Hotel Assocs., 168 A.D.2d 964). We modify the order on appeal by denying plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on liability under Labor Law § 240 (2).


Summaries of

Pulsifer v. Eastman Kodak Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 29, 1995
219 A.D.2d 880 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Pulsifer v. Eastman Kodak Company

Case Details

Full title:JERRY J. PULSIFER et al., Respondents, v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 29, 1995

Citations

219 A.D.2d 880 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
631 N.Y.S.2d 948

Citing Cases

Robinson v. City of NY

However, while plaintiff is entitled to a finding that there was a statutory violation, the factual issue to…

Robinson v. City of New York

However, while plaintiff is entitled to a finding that there was a statutory violation, the factual issue to…