From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Knight v. Conopco, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 9, 1995
216 A.D.2d 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

June 9, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Siracuse, J.

Present — Lawton, J.P., Fallon, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on liability under Labor Law § 240 because there is a question of fact whether the alleged violation of the statute was a proximate cause of the injuries allegedly sustained by David M. Knight (plaintiff) (see, Rossi v. Main-South Hotel Assocs., 168 A.D.2d 964). The court did not abuse its discretion in granting in part the motions of defendant and third-party defendant to compel disclosure of video evidence concerning the entertainment activities of plaintiff after the date of the accident.


Summaries of

Knight v. Conopco, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 9, 1995
216 A.D.2d 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Knight v. Conopco, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID M. KNIGHT et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. CONOPCO, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 9, 1995

Citations

216 A.D.2d 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
629 N.Y.S.2d 697

Citing Cases

Singleton v. Avalon Bay Cmtys. Inc.

Finally, it is questionable that plaintiff could have fallen to the dumpster where there was deposition…

Pulsifer v. Eastman Kodak Company

Unlike the plaintiff in Bonaparte v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. ( 188 A.D.2d 853), Pulsifer did not fall at…