From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Proposed Amendment of Rule 6.201

Supreme Court of Michigan
Mar 16, 2010
485 Mich. 1342 (Mich. 2010)

Opinion

March 16, 2010.


Special Orders.

Order Entered March 16, 2010:

On order of the Court, this is to advise that the Court is considering an amendment of Rule 6.201 of the Michigan Court Rules. Before determining whether the proposal should be adopted, changed before adoption, or rejected, this notice is given to afford interested persons the opportunity to comment on the form or the merits of the proposal or to suggest alternatives. The Court welcomes the views of all. This matter also will be considered at a public hearing. The riotices and agendas for public hearings are posted at www.courts.michigan.gov/supremecourt.

Publication of this proposal does not mean that the Court will issue an order on the subject, nor does it imply probable adoption of the proposal in its present form.

[Additions are indicated by underlining and deletions are indicated by strikeover.]

RULE 6.201. DISCOVERY.

(A) Mandatory Disclosure. In addition to disclosures required by provisions of law other than MCL 767.94a, a party upon request must provide all other parties:

(1) the names and addresses of all lay and expert witnesses whom the party may call at trial; in the alternative, a party may provide the name of the witness and make the witness available to the other party for interview; the witness list may be amended without leave of the court no later than 28 days before trial;

(2) any written or recorded statement, including electronically recorded statements, pertaining to the case by a lay witness whom the party may call at trial, except that a defendant is not obliged to provide the defendant's own statement;

(3) the curriculum vitae of an expert the party may call at trial and either a report by the expert or a written description of the substance of the proposed testimony of the expert, the expert's opinion, and the underlying basis of that opinion;

(4) any criminal record that the party may use at trial to impeach a witness;,

(5) a description or list of criminal convictions, known to the defense attorney or prosecuting attorney, of any witness whom the party may call at trial; and

(6) a description of and an opportunity to inspect any tangible physical evidence that the party may introduce at trial, including any document, photograph, or other paper, with copies to be provided on request. A party may request a hearing regarding any question of costs of reproduction. On good cause shown, the court may order that a party be given the opportunity to test without destruction any tangible physical evidence.

(B) Discovery of Information Known to the Prosecuting Attorney. Upon request, the prosecuting attorney must provide each defendant:

(1) any exculpatory information or evidence known to the prosecuting attorney;

(2) any police report and interrogation records concerning the case, except so much of a report as concerns a continuing investigation;

(3) any written or recorded statements, including electronically re-corded statements, by a defendant, codefendant, or accomplice pertaining to the case, even if that person is not a prospective witness at trial;

(4) any affidavit, warrant, and return pertaining to a search or seizure in connection with the case; and

(5) any plea agreement, grant of immunity, or other agreement for testimony in connection with the case:

(C)-(J) [Unchanged.]

(K) Except as otherwise provided in MCR 2.302(B)(6). electronic materials are to be treated in the same manner as nonelectronic materials under this rule. Staff Comment: This amendment requires prosecutors to provide to defendants any electronic recording made by governmental agencies pertaining to the case known to the prosecutor.

The staff comment is not an authoritative construction by the Court.

A copy of this order will be given to the Secretary of the State Bar and to the State Court Administrator so that they can make the notifications specified in MCR 1.201. Comments on these proposals may be sent to the Supreme Court Clerk in writing or electronically by July 1, 2010, at RO. Box 30052, Lansing, MI 48909, or MSC_clerk courts.mi.gov. When filing a comment, please refer to ADM File No. 2008-38. Your comments and the comments of others will be posted athttp://www.courts.mi.gov/ supremecourt/resources/administrative/index.htm. than grants and denials of leave to appeal from the Court of Appeals) of general interest to the bench and bar of the state.


Summaries of

Proposed Amendment of Rule 6.201

Supreme Court of Michigan
Mar 16, 2010
485 Mich. 1342 (Mich. 2010)
Case details for

Proposed Amendment of Rule 6.201

Case Details

Full title:PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF RULE 6.201 OF THE MICHIGAN COURT RULES

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Mar 16, 2010

Citations

485 Mich. 1342 (Mich. 2010)