From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Du Preez v. Banis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Dec 20, 2017
CIV NO. 14-00171 LEK-RLP (D. Haw. Dec. 20, 2017)

Opinion

CIV NO. 14-00171 LEK-RLP

12-20-2017

RONI DU PREEZ, Plaintiff, v. RICK BANIS, DON CARANO, FRED SCARPELLO, AND JOHN MACKALL, AS TRUSTEES OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM PENNINGTON; WNP ENTERPRISES, INC.; AND WESTERN EQUITIES LLC., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on October 18, 2017, and no objections having been filed by any party,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the "Findings and Recommendation To Grant In Part And Deny In Part Defendants' Motion For An Award Of Attorneys' Fees And Non-Taxable Costs", ECF NO. [356] are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED AT HONOLULU, HAWAI`I, December 20, 2017.

/s/ Leslie E. Kobayashi

Leslie E. Kobayashi

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Du Preez v. Banis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Dec 20, 2017
CIV NO. 14-00171 LEK-RLP (D. Haw. Dec. 20, 2017)
Case details for

Du Preez v. Banis

Case Details

Full title:RONI DU PREEZ, Plaintiff, v. RICK BANIS, DON CARANO, FRED SCARPELLO, AND…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

Date published: Dec 20, 2017

Citations

CIV NO. 14-00171 LEK-RLP (D. Haw. Dec. 20, 2017)

Citing Cases

Privratsky v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

“[T]he Hawaii Supreme Court has determined that the amount requested by counsel at trial is sufficient to…